All posts by Jim/VINEgeek

Cork’d Tasting with Gary V in Austin

GV_at_CorkdATX
Thanks to @SummerH for the photo above

Gary Vaynerchuk made a stop in Austin recently on his book tour for Crush It!: Why NOW Is the Time to Cash In on Your Passion. In addition to the three book signings he did around town that day, he and Lindsay Ronga organized a Cork’d tasting that night. (Cork’d is the wine social networking site GV bought in 2007; Lindsay is the CEO). I was fortunate enough to get an invite (thanks, Addie!) and had a great time. I thought I’d share a bit about it.

Gary is unpretentious about wine. And this was not a pretentious wine tasting. Firstly, it was held in the conference room of a local tech firm. Secondly, the wine geeks seemed to be in the minority. Thirdly, we were drinking from plastic cups.

As this was a Cork’d event, the idea was for everyone to post their notes to the site “live” as we were tasting them. It was a diverse crowd and a diverse range of opinions and scores were collected (every wine received scores as low as mid-70s and as high as low-90s). Below are the wines we tasted and my comments.

Terlato Family Pinot Noir 2007 Russian River Valley

For me this was easily the best wine of the night. My notes were:  Nice cherry, meaty and herbal nose. The fruit gets darker on the palate, but very clean and pure. Very smooth and silky on the front then tightens up on the back. This is a lip-smacking, delicious pinot. Would be a great food wine. I scored it a 90 (Cork’d requires a score on the 100-pt scale).

Rutherford Hill Merlot 2005 Napa Valley

My notes: The color is a bit light. The nose is juicy, “purple-y” and stemmy/green. On the palate, the red fruit comes across a bit fake to me, and thin. Rustic tannins. Feels like I drank some sediment. Buttery oak. A little stemmy. A nice mineral note in there. Dry finish. Kinda of an awkward wine for me. It’s not bad, but I wouldn’t seek it out again. Score: 85

Mont Tauch Reserve Fitou 2006

My notes: I like this nose – jammy for a French wine. On the palate, it feels light and tannic at the same time. I’m having trouble pegging this one. Fruit seems a bit tight one moment, then bright the next. I’d like to try this again when I can have a more leisurely glass or two. Score: 86

Lamborn Family Cabernet Sauvignon 2004/2005/2006 Howell Mountain

This wasn’t a vertical. Rather, there was not enough of any one of these to go around, so everyone got poured 1 of the 3. I got the 2006. My notes: Good dark color. A dark, brooding, smoky nose. On the palate its got jammy fruit flavors. Feels sticky in the mouth, like a chewy candy. Very dry. Finishes hot. The nose appealed to me, but the palate… not so much. I’d like to try it again with a few more years of bottle age. (Score reflects how it’s drinking for my palate tonight.) Score: 86

Flat Creek Super Texan 2006 Texas Hill Country

This one was meant to be a surprise blind tasting for Gary, while the rest of the crowd was told what it was. There were some loose lips from one or two people who didn’t quite realize what was going on so Gary probably heard something. It’s a wine I’ve liked in the past and I was kind of excited to see how he would like it. He panned it. I found it to be light but tasty. My notes: Color has an orange cast. Nose has appealing dried fruit character. Nice mouthfeel. Silky red fruit. Long finish. Score: 89  (probably generous in retrospect)

You can see the list at Cork’d and click each wine to see everyone’s notes.

All in all, it was a great night. No blockbuster wines for me, but some nice (& pricey) bottles I wouldn’t normally try (and did I mention it was free!). It was fun to see so many tasting notes on the same wine from the same tasting.

Plus I got to meet some good people: @ronga, @baconator, @personalwine, @amberdemure, @SummerH, @smartdonkey, @wesley83. And Gary…

Yes my teeth are purple. Yes that's Randall Grahm on my shirt.
Yes, my teeth are purple. Yes, that's Randall Grahm on my shirt.
Thanks to @baconator for the photo above: http://www.flickr.com/photos/my-misc-pics/ / CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
More event photos from @SummerH and @baconator.

Update: I realized I published this without really saying much about Gary. In person, he’s pretty much exactly like he is on camera only dialed down a notch. Or maybe that was the fact that it was his 4th stop of the day in the middle of his book tour. Either way he’s unfailingly friendly, taking the time to go around the room and shake every one’s hand individually and chatting them up. As for the wine, he liked the Terlato, Lamborn (he had the 2004) and Rutherford Hill wines, was ho-hum on the Mont Tauch and panned the Flat Creek (as I mentioned above). Thanks, Gary, for putting on this event! Hope to see you again the next time you come through Austin.

Breast Cancer Awareness Month Wine Recommendation

National Breast Cancer Awareness Month is winding down and pink has been everywhere. Even the NFL got in on it in a big way. So maybe that’s why I noticed this wine on an end-cap display at my local supermarket. It’s from Cline Cellars (a winery that regular readers will know I am a fan of) and it has a pink ribbon on the label. Cline is a supporter of the Breast Cancer Network of Strength Ride to Empower, and a portion of the proceeds from sales of this wine goes to this cause.

Cline07Cashmere_FLabelCline 2007 Cashmere

Producer: Cline Cellars

Grapes: 39% Grenache, 38% Syrah, 23% Mourvèdre

Appellation: California

Vineyards: Most of the Grenache comes from the Massoni Vineyard in Oakley. The rest of the Grenache and all of the Mourvèdre comes from the Big Break vineyard (also in Oakley). Big Break is one of Cline’s ancient vine vineyard jewels, with 80-120 year old gnarly, head-pruned vines in sandy (phylloxera-resistant) soil. The Syrah comes from Paso Robles.

Winemaking: Stainless steel fermentation. 9 months in dark-toast French oak (25% new).

Alcohol: 14.5%

Price: $15-16 retail

My tasting notes: A pretty violet-red color. The aroma is all sweet, creamy oakyness. On the palate, I’m immediately struck by the smoothness of this wine – Cashmere, indeed. It has luscious plummy, red berry, and blackberry flavors, with vanillin oak and spice accents. A touch of mint on the finish, which comes from the influence of a eucalyptus grove adjacent to the Big Break vineyard. Tasty stuff.

Overall impression: If you really don’t like oak-influenced wines, this probably isn’t for you. But it’s just plain delicious. I think this will be the wine I recommend the next time I get asked by a non-wine nerd for a good bottle. It’s very easy to drink, has terrific mouthfeel and I don’t see anyone not liking it (except the oak-haters). B+

Free association: This probably isn’t fair to Cline and their very nice wine, but I couldn’t resist once I saw this. The dresses below are from a fashion show put on by Canada’s top-selling brand of bathroom tissue: Cashmere. The dresses are “crafted entirely in 100 per cent pure, soft and luxurious sheets of Cashmere Bathroom Tissue.” The fashion show is part of a campaign to raise awareness and funds for the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation.

CashmereTPdressPR

More info:

The winery’s tech sheet.

For more info and photos from the fashion show, click here.

Haka Tempranillo 2007 Paso Robles

I was turned on to this wine by Sam Scarpari, an Aussie winemaker (Seraphim Wines), wine vlogger and Twitter-friend (@SeraphimWines). One night, I had just tasted a not-so-good Tempranillo from California and tweeted something to that effect, asking the Twitterverse if anyone had had a good example of the grape from the Golden State. Sam pointed me to this bottle, the Haka Tempranillo 2007 Paso Robles. I hadn’t heard of it before and I sort of assumed it would be hard to find and wasn’t sure if I would make the effort of trying to order it online. But as luck would have it, within a week or two I saw it on the shelves at Spec’s here in Austin.

HakaTempranillo07_snapshotProducer: Haka, by Labyrinth. Rick Hill is a Kiwi winemaker who makes Pinot Noir in both Australia and California under the Labyrinth label. Haka is his second label.

Grapes: Tempranillo

Appellation: Paso Robles (AVA, California)

Vineyards: no info

Winemaking: no info

Alcohol: 14.5%

Price: $18-20

My tasting notes: On the nose I get Pepsi fizz, coffee grounds, red fruit and a bit of fig. On the palate, this wine has good density with strawberry and mixed berry jam flavors. The oak is sweet, but there is a high-toned minerality keeping everything in check. It finishes long and cool, with grippy tannins.

Overall assessment: Very nice wine. I don’t know that I’ve had a better Tempranillo from California (though I haven’t had many). It has New World fruit intensity that gets a tad overripe for me, but the overall tightness and complexity of this wine impressed me. B+

Free association:

More info:

Sam Scarpari’s Wine Passion TV episode reviewing this wine. It’s funny to me that I called out the Pepsi/cola notes… In Sam’s review of the wine, which I watched once a couple of days before opening the bottle, he mentions “cola” a few times, but I didn’t know that’s what he was saying due to the Aussie accent. It wasn’t until I rewatched after tasting the wine, that I understood him (or at least I think that’s what he said – correct me if I’m wrong, Sam!).

An article on the winemaker and the Labyrinth brand (from City Beat/Cincinnati, of all places).

Info on the haka genre of Māori dance at Wikipedia.

Renwood Zinfandel 2007 Lodi

logo-renhiendlabelhiI picked this up while browsing at Spec’s when I saw that it had Viognier in the blend. It’s not very common for white and red grapes to be blended together – the biggest exceptions being old-school Chianti and Côte Rôtie. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Zin/Viognier blend. Let’s see what it’s like.

Producer: Renwood

Grapes: 85% Zinfandel, 11% Syrah, 4% Viognier

Appellation: Lodi

Vineyards: The Zinfandel grapes are from “middle-aged” vineyards (30+ years old)

Winemaking: Interestingly, only 15% of the blend was aged in oak, and used oak at that. There is no indication on the tech sheet as to whether the Viognier was co-fermented or blended later, though based on the color I’m assuming it was blended.

Alcohol: 13.6%

Price: I paid $10 or $11 on sale at Spec’s in Austin (I think the regular price is closer to $13-14).

My tasting notes: Fairly light in color, surely due to the dose of Viognier (a white wine, for those who aren’t familiar with the grape). It has a pretty nose. I get the floral note from the Viognier and loads of raspberries, but not in a jammy way. There is also a wet-earth quality and a bit of sweet oak as well.  On the palate, it comes across as a relatively light-bodied wine, with more red fruit, slightly earthy flavors and a smooth, silky texture.

Overall assessment: A modest style of Zinfandel, which is less and less common these days. A nice quaff, if you don’t require a wine from the “These go to eleven” school of Zin. B-

Free association:

modesty

Question: Have you ever tasted or seen a Zin/Viognier blend?

More info:

Thanks to Renwood for emailing me the tech sheet which wasn’t available online.

I can’t find many reviews/tasting notes of this wine online. Wilfred Wong of BevMo gave it an 87. And there’s one review at CellarTracker. That’s all I could find.

Cline Small Berry Mourvedre 2005

Cline_SmallBerry_Mourvedre_05_FrontLabelAs I’ve noted in earlier posts, I’ve been a big fan of Cline wines since my very first trip to wine country in the mid-90s. Theirs was my first introduction to Mourvèdre and I’ve been a “Mourvèdre-head” ever since.

Producer: Cline

Grapes: 100% Mourvèdre

Appellation: Contra Costa County

Vineyards: From a 9-acre block of 100+ year old vines in sandy soil. Dry-farmed (no irrigation) and head trained (not trained onto a trellis system). There are eucalyptus trees near the vineyard, which show up in the profile of this wine (see below).

Winemaking: Fermented in stainless steel, then 15 months in medium-toast French and American oak barrels (a mix of new and used).

Alcohol: 14.5%

Price: This wine retails for around $32, I believe.  (I purchased it via Cline’s Pendulum Club.)

My tasting notes: Wow – the aroma of this wine leaps from the glass and all I can think of is Andes Candies – you know, those foil-wrapped chocolate and mint candies. (My wife says it reminds her of Mystic Mints.) Some red fruit as well, but the chocolate/mint really dominates. On the palate, it’s soft-textured, plush even. Red and blue fruit flavors with a minty cool finish. Wild stuff.

Overall assessment: I’ve had several prior vintages of this wine and the mint always stands out (more strongly in this vintage than any I can remember tasting). It comes from the eucalyptus trees near the vineyard. If you’re dubious, there is science supporting this. That clear expression of the vineyard site is exciting to me. The flavor profile may not be for everyone, and I can’t say it’s a strong value, but it’s a distinctive wine that I look forward to trying every year. B+

Free association:

AndesCandies

More info:

The winery’s tech sheet.

Tasting notes at CellarTracker.

Is “$20 & Under” the New Low-End for Wine?

FoodandWineGuide2010I picked up the Food & Wine Wine Guide 2010 the other day. I’ve always enjoyed these guides and have picked them up every other year or so. For each major region they provide an overview of the style of wines produced along with recommended wines and tasting notes. It’s necessarily general given that it’s trying to cover so many regions and remain a “pocket” guide, but it’s a good browsing book. In fact I used to keep one in my car and would glance at it when stopped at red lights! (I like Oz Clarke’s pocket guides, too.)

But the reason I’m posting about it today is the way the guide handles price categories. Each wine noted in the guide (and remember they’re all recommended wines) is labeled to indicate quality and price. The 2010 guide uses the following categories:

QUALITY

★★★★ OUTSTANDING Worth a search

★★★ EXCELLENT Top-notch of its type

★★ VERY GOOD Distinctive

★ GOOD Delicious everyday wine

PRICE

$$$$ OVER $60

$$$ $31 to $60

$$ $21 to 30

$ $20 and under

So what surprised me about this is the bottom price range. $20 and under is the starting point now? I don’t know about you, but I do the bulk of my wine buying in that range. In fact, I’d say $15 is my usual threshold for everyday wine. So for me, and I suspect most wine buyers, lumping $20 bottles in with $10-12 bottles isn’t very helpful. I should reiterate here that they do not provide a specific price for each wine; they only indicate if it’s $ or $$ or $$$ or $$$$.

I think this is especially puzzling given that at the beginning of the guide, in a section called “The Year in Wine”, they highlight the trend toward bargain wines:

Demand for wines priced over $50 dropped precipitously … while bottles priced at $10 or less soared in popularity – accounting for fully 66 percent of the U.S. wine market’s estimated $30 billion in annual sales.

So given that, why wouldn’t you distinguish between $10 bottles and $20 bottles? Who do they think the audience for this book is? I mean, they sell it in supermarkets. (That’s where I bought mine.) If someone sees that they recommend the Long Boat Sauvignon Blanc 2008 Marlborough (★, $) then looks for it in the shop and sees it’s $18, I suspect most would no longer see that as a bargain.

I went back to my guides from previous years and see that they were using $15 and under as recently as the 2008 guide (I don’t have the 2009). That seems like the right point to me. Especially when many of the $ wines are also ★. If one-star wines are “delicious everyday wine” but not “distinctive”, I don’t want to be plopping down a twenty for them.

Question: So what do you think? Is $20 your low-end threshold? If not what is? Please leave a comment with your thoughts.

TwentyDollarBill

Cannonau – WBW #62: A Grape By Any Other Name

Argiolos Costera-Bottle Shot

The theme of this month’s Wine Blogging Wednesday #62 (hosted by Dale Cruse at Drinks Are On Me) is “A Grape By Any Other Name”. The idea is to taste a wine labeled with a lesser known name of an otherwise common grape. Now this is the sort of thing that I’d normally stew over at length. However, on a recent trip to Costco, I happened upon a bottle that I thought was a great fit: a 100% Cannonau from Sardinia.

Argiolas Costera 2006 Isola dei Nuraghi

Producer: Argiolas

Grapes: 100% Cannonau – the name for Grenache in Sardinia

Appellation: Isola Dei Nuraghi IGT (Sardinia, Italy)

Vineyards: The Costera vineyard, a 61-acre vineyard with clay and limestone soils and southeasterly exposure. It was planted in 1989.

Winemaking: Tank fermented, then spent 6-8 months in French barriques.

Alcohol: 13.9%

Price: $14 at Costco

My tasting notes: Dark, yet translucent. A gemlike garnet in color. On the nose, this wine is pungent with tire shop smells. If there’s fruit there it is well-hidden. In the mouth, there is a lot of iron and perhaps a little tarriness, but some good raspberry fruit comes through as well. It finishes with nice grippy tannins. After being open a few hours, the tire aroma recedes and the fruit shows up on the nose. The palate integrates a bit more and starts to lean toward wild berries and meaty flavors, while retaining a stony minerality. On day two it’s drinking even better – the fruit is really shining now and it’s plush while retaining some backbone.

Overall assessment: I enjoyed drinking it over a couple days, and at $14 I don’t think it’s a bad value, but I do think there is a lot of competition at that price as well – stuff I like even more. However, I like finding nice wines like this from regions I rarely think about. B-

Reflecting on the theme of this WBW, I think this Cannonau has some similarities and some differences from the Grenache wines I’ve been drinking recently. First, it does convey the minerality that I find in Garnacha from Spain (e.g., Montsant) or Grenache from the Southern Rhone (e.g., Vacqueyras, Vinsobres). On the other hand, this one is much more tightly wound and takes lots of time (day 2) before the delicious fruit shows up. Of course, much of the French and Spanish Grenache/Garnacha is blended, often with Syrah, while this is 100% varietal. It was definitely an interesting bottle and I’m glad Dale’s WBW theme led me to it.

Free association:

TireTreadMacro

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cobalt/ / CC BY-NC 2.0

More info:

Imported by Winebow/Leonardo LoCascio. Lots of geekster details on the wine at their website.

CellarTracker tasting notes (avg. 88 points).

Other blogger reviews: Viva la Wino, Canadian Wine Guy, The Gastronome’s Cellar and Wine Belly.

Introducing the VINEgeek Free Association Mosaic

If you’ve read any of my posts, you’ve noticed that after the tasting notes and overall assessment I include a “free association”. It’s usually an image of some sort (sometimes a song or video) that conveys something about the wine. Sometimes its very literal, like a photo of pink balloons for a rose wine that had a balloon aroma. Other times it’s more figurative, like a photo of the ‘Darth Tater’ Mr. Potato Head figure for a wine that struck me as dark but friendly. Either way, this is the most fun part of writing posts for me, and I hope you like them too.

I thought it would be fun to assemble all these images in one place, so I’m introducing a new page on the site…

The VINEgeek Free Association Mosaic

FreeAssocMosaic_Screenshot(Click screenshot above to check out the actual page.)

It makes for an interesting collection of images, I think. And, I hope, it piques your curiousity and makes you want to click around to discover the wines behind the Sea Monkeys ad, the Iron Man comic cover or the deep-fried Oreos.

There will be a link to it at the top of the blog and I plan to keep it up-to-date.

What do you think? Fun or foolish?

Vale do Bomfim 2006 Douro

Bomfim_bottleshotAs sales of Port have been trending downward, many Port houses are using a portion of their grapes to produce red table wines. I like Port, but I drink it maybe a couple times a year and almost always at a restaurant by the glass. So I love this trend. I love that they use indigenous grapes that are rarely found elsewhere. I love that they aren’t 15% alcohol monsters. And I love the price point – most are under $15.

Let’s see if this one is a winner.

Producer: Symington Family Estates (Dow’s)

Grapes: 40% Touriga Franca, 25% Tinta Roriz (the Portuguese name for Tempranillo), 20% Tinta Barroca, and 15% Touriga Nacional.

Appellation: Douro Valley DOC (Portugal)

Vineyards: Quinta do Bomfim (profile) & Quinta da Senhora da Ribeira (profile). Schist soils and hillside vineyards.

Winemaking: Stainless steel fermentation, then 9 months in a mix of French and American oak.

Alcohol: 13%

Price: $10-12

My tasting notes: Inky dark color – near opaque. Nose of dark fruit, oak and dried flowers. (Both Touriga Franca and Touriga Nacional are noted for producing wines with floral qualities). A bit green and stemmy, but not in an unpleasant way. Rich blackberry and cherry flavors with leather, mineral and chocolate notes and chewy, spicy tannins. Maybe a bit on the rustic side. A lengthy finish.

Overall assessment: This is an enjoyable red for those who don’t require exuberant fruit. While there is a richness to this wine, and it’s certainly not austere, it’s not what I think most people would consider fruit-forward (note the lower alcohol, too). I liked it and would like to try it again with more time in bottle. B-

Free association: I normally don’t use photos of the vineyards in my “free association” spot. I like to be less literal. But the Douro is such freaking beautiful vineyard land, that’s what my mind goes to when I think of these wines. Feast your eyes…

Dows_Bomfim_VineyardTerraces Dows_BomfimWalls

Dows_Senhora-da-Ribeira_Vineyard Dows_Senhora-da-Ribeira_Vineyard2

(Photos from the Dow’s website.)

More info:

Other bloggers reviews of this wine (all liked it): The Wine Curmudgeon, The Grape CrusaderThe Wine Skinny, Red White and FoodThe O’Neill Review. Also a few reviews at Cork’d and CellarTracker.

A discussion of the 2006 vintage in the Douro (and at Bomfim in particular) by Paul and Charles Symington at JancisRobinson.com

The producer’s tech sheet.

Portugal: The California of Europe” – Interesting marketing from PortugalWines, a promotional organization for Portuguese wines in the US. Isn’t it usually the US producers comparing latitudes with famous European wine regions?

Boots Grenache 2005 Barossa

Boots05Grenache_snapshot

Producer: Trevor Jones (Boots label)

Grapes: Grenache

Appellation: Barossa (Australia)

Vineyards: Old bush vines

Winemaking: This wine sees some time in French oak, but just how long isn’t clear from the label or website.

Alcohol: 14.5%

Price: $12-13

My tasting notes: Very light color. Bright nose of pine forest, cherries (cherry cough syrup, really) and Wint-O-Green LifeSavers. Some oak coming through as well. On the palate, this wine is silky and pleasant with cherry, herbs and a maple syrup quality. But it lacks backbone. There’s a bit of tannic grip at the end and a dry finish, but overall it feels unstructured.

Overall assessment: Not what I expected from a Barossa wine; it’s certainly not BIG and jammy. This wine walks the fine line between interesting and odd. I think I’m giving it the benefit of the doubt and calling it interesting. C+

Free association:

odd_shaped_glasses

More info:

This wine scored an 89 in The Wine Advocate (Jay Miller).

A few tasting notes at CellarTracker.

The Grateful Palate is the importer. Here’s their page on this wine (though it appears to not be updated to the 05).